🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.